What should be documented when a batch ticket shows a nonconformity with contract requirements?

What should be documented when a batch ticket shows a nonconformity with contract requirements?

• A. Re-check the ticket against the order after the batch has been placed.
• B. Bypass the contract and proceed with the next batch.
• C. Document the nonconformity, notify the responsible parties, and segregate or stop placement per contract.
• D. Ignore the nonconformity if the visual appearance seems acceptable.

Answer: (C)

When a batch ticket shows a nonconformity with contract requirements, the proper action is to document the nonconformity, notify the responsible parties, and segregate or stop placement per the contract. Documenting creates a formal record of what doesn’t meet specifications, which is essential for traceability and accountability. Notifying the parties responsible—such as the contractor, the concrete producer, and the project’s inspector or quality control representative—ensures that someone authorized can determine the disposition of the batch. Segregating or stopping placement prevents nonconforming concrete from being placed, protecting the integrity of the structure and allowing the correct corrective actions to be taken per contract, such as rework, acceptance testing, or removal. This approach is necessary because attempting to re-check after the batch has already been produced or placed does not resolve the nonconformity and could lead to nonconforming concrete being used. Bypassing the contract or proceeding despite a nonconformity because the appearance seems acceptable also undermines quality control and contract compliance, creating risk for the project. In short, document the issue, inform the responsible parties, and halt or segregate placement until a proper disposition is determined.

When a batch ticket shows a nonconformity with contract requirements, the proper action is to document the nonconformity, notify the responsible parties, and segregate or stop placement per the contract. Documenting creates a formal record of what doesn’t meet specifications, which is essential for traceability and accountability. Notifying the parties responsible—such as the contractor, the concrete producer, and the project’s inspector or quality control representative—ensures that someone authorized can determine the disposition of the batch. Segregating or stopping placement prevents nonconforming concrete from being placed, protecting the integrity of the structure and allowing the correct corrective actions to be taken per contract, such as rework, acceptance testing, or removal.

This approach is necessary because attempting to re-check after the batch has already been produced or placed does not resolve the nonconformity and could lead to nonconforming concrete being used. Bypassing the contract or proceeding despite a nonconformity because the appearance seems acceptable also undermines quality control and contract compliance, creating risk for the project.

In short, document the issue, inform the responsible parties, and halt or segregate placement until a proper disposition is determined.